Sourav Mandal ([info]smandal) wrote,
@ 2008-03-28 17:53:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:politics

Advocating jury nullification and suborning perjury
An anonymous Texas prosecutor claims that advocating jury nullification is aggravated perjury under Texas law.

There are two obvious reasons why this is crap:

* Advocating jury nullification does not meet the imminent lawless action test.

* Jury nullification is an element of common law.

Of course, jury nullification can be used for both good (e.g., preventing egregious jail sentences in drug possession cases) and evil (e.g., letting violent white supremacists off the hook).

In any event, if someone is interested in passing voir dire honestly in order to find the defendent not guilty on principle, can he invoke the Eight Amendment to do so?



(Post a new comment)


[info]clevermynnie
2008-03-28 01:46 pm UTC (link)
I remember reading before I went in for jury duty that you should not admit to knowing what jury nullification is, because often if you do they will find a reason to not select you. This was from some jury advocacy group.

(Reply to this)


[info]mac6uffin
2008-03-29 05:48 pm UTC (link)
While jury nullification is allowed (and needed IMHO at certain times), an attorney cannot expressly argue for it. It is highly unethical and will result in ethics charges.

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…